Historic Sexual abuse  – No Further Action – No Charges brought – 2023

Andy was instructed in a sensitive and complex case by a grandparent who was alleged to have committed offences of sexual assault by penetration against a grandchild over a decade prior, when the complainant was still a child.

Using the Pre-charge advice and assistance protocols, Andy diligently and comprehensively built the defence case, taking a multi-faceted approach whilst the matter was still at the investigation stage. Andy was then able to provide the extensive defence evidence obtained to Police, to prevent a prosecution and the necessity for Court proceedings. Having considered the evidence provided by the defence the Police and CPS would take No Further Action against our client and the matter was closed.

As part of an all-encompassing and thorough defence investigation, Andy had taken detailed witness statements from a large number of close family members casting considerable doubt upon the veracity of the claims, including the reliability of the complainant, the motivations of the complainant, including the malign influence of the complainant’s father towards the rest of the family and the lack of opportunity to commit the alleged offences. Andy was also able to utilise psychiatric reports, dealing with the mental health issues of the complainant, medical evidence providing strong evidence that our client was physically incapable of behaving in the manner described by the complainant at the time of the allegations, and historical text messages between the complainant and our client and historical photographs of the scene all of which significantly undermined the complainants account together with other evidence.

At the conclusion of the investigation, and as a result of the evidence obtained and produced by the defence, a review took place and it was decided that there was not a realistic prospect of a conviction, and No Further Action was taken against our client.

The case illustrates the importance of the defence being pro-active during the investigation and when appropriate using the pre-charge advice and engagement protocols. Whilst Andy had attended at the Police interview with his client providing a lengthy and detailed prepared statement to Police, the complexity of the case required significant input from the defence to provide Police with additional significant evidence that pointed away from our client’s guilt which otherwise may not have been obtained at all by Police and would therefore have not been considered when deciding whether to bring charges or not.

Other Relevant Murray Hughman Cases

Filter

R v AB – Large Scale Drugs Conspiracy at Guildford Crown Court – 2024

Following a Trial lasting 17 days, Andy Rootsey's client, ‘AB’ was acquitted at Guildford Crown Court of conspiracy to supply cocaine on an industrial scale across the Southeast.
Read More

R v G Conspiracy to Steal at Warwick Crown Court – 2024

Andy was instructed to represent his client in a case involving a large-scale conspiracy to steal high value equipment from the BT Openreach company, at locations across the width and breadth of the UK, over a 10-month period.
Read More

R v R – 2024

Acting for the alleged head of an organised crime network supplying cocaine throughout the United Kingdom.
Read More

R v O – County Lines Supply of Class A Drugs at Norwich Crown Court – 2024

The client was alleged to be concerned in the large-scale supply of Class A drugs as the operator for a county drugs supply line covering the East Anglia area.
Read More

R v J Conspiracy to Supply Drugs at Portsmouth Crown Court – 2024

Andy was instructed to represent his client alleged to have played a leading role in the large scale supply of class A,B,C and prescription drugs which were sent out via the postal system to customers across the country.
Read More

R v T – 2024

Acted for the alleged ‘UK end’ of an international cocaine smuggling ring worth in excess of £2 million.
Read More

Get In Touch…

Call us on 020 7701 8653.

Get in Touch